North Regional Cultural Strategy

4.2.

SWOT analysis for the Northern Region

Below are a set of overarching headline findings drawn from the research and consultation exercise that

informed this strategy:

Strengths

Weaknesses

→Cultural heritage assets - the region is very rich in this aspect,

having a myriad of tangible and intangible heritage assets. Such

assets could be better used to enhance cultural engagement

across communities.

→A balance between rural and urban areas - the region is known

for its rural areas which retain some of the more traditional

landscapes of Malta that include diverse flora and agricultural

fields that provide for beautiful scenery.

→Collaboration and sense of friendship between core

communities - many of the localities in the region have a

strong sense of community that goes back generations. While

this might make it difficult for new generations and incoming

communities to integrate, the strength of the community can

be nurtured as an asset for all residents.

→Cultural diversity - the distinctive cultural diversity in the region

generates many opportunities for creative exchange and the

development of new cultural programmes. The balance between

the local traditional community and diverse newer communities

could be a real strength within the region.

→A perceived ‘parochial mentality’ with resistance by some to

embrace change – while core community sentiment can be

a strength, it could also be a cause of strain and discontent,

especially in relation to any forward-looking proposals put

forward. It can also be a resisting factor in terms of the

opportunities that diversity brings.

→Lack of cultural and organisational capacity – for example,

there seems to be limited professional expertise in events

management and cultural and creative understanding. Although

there is a strong impetus to create events for the community,

understanding and knowledge of event management and how to

engage audiences among Local Councils is limited.

→A system that is predominantly centralised and run by Central

Government – conversations with the local stakeholders

revealed a common concern about how the present national

governance system operates. The highly centralised system

is perceived to be a hindrance to the daily operations and

prospective organisational development of the localities and

the regions.

→Lack of awareness of local assets and community interests –

given the limited cultural exchange between communities and a

historical lack of asset mapping and promotion, cultural assets

have not been viewed as a key resource for the community and

regional development.

→Divergent priorities (between the region and localities; between

different localities) – the priorities of the region and the

localities are not always aligned due to the specificities of the

localities. Relations between the region and the different Local

Councils and among the localities themselves are sometimes

strained, with each locality lobbying for its own aims.

→Disenfranchised communities and disconnection with cultural

programming – typically, non-Maltese residents do not actively

engage in cultural activities organised by the Local Councils.

From research, it is evident that the events organised by the

Local Councils are highly influenced by identity politics, in

turn reflecting the dominant cultural narrative of the ‘Maltese

identity’ resulting in a general lack of representation in terms

of diversity and multiple identities. This increasingly widens the

gap between intrinsically local communities and others who feel

disconnected.

25

Arts Council Malta